Finally, now that the characters, plot and themes have been disclosed, the seven reasons why CCSVI Rebels will win this MS Liberation War will be better understood.

Reason One. This struggle is based on a just, reasonable society that excludes greed, ego, and profits.

We want a reasonable society outside the shadow of the Fortress and fear of backlash where one professional doctor, a neurologist, should be able to say to another professional doctor, a vascular specialist or to

a MS patient,

"I have my theory...my 60 year old curriculum. You may follow it, if you want to and take the FDA approved drugs. But I will also accept the fact that I do not know everything about this perplexing disease. I will

refer you to get a second opinion, if you wish."

We want a primary care system where interventional radiologists will work with neurologists and medical issues will be best decide by qualified doctors from all disciplines not bandied about by lobbyists or

politicians.

Reason Two. This struggle will continue in the name of scientific studies where treatment is not exclusive from CCSVI research. Perhaps clinical medical research has become something much different from real scientific research, motivated more by prestigious

universities and corporate finances with double standards...just look at

the advertisements and side effects. The people pay for it with

insurance premiums, drug prices, and taxes. CCSVI, or faulty veins, is a

condition, not a treatment. There are abundant data now that

demonstrate that a significantly higher % of persons with MS have CCSVI

as compared with the general population. More rigorous, peer reviewed

studies need to progress with angioplasties on neck veins, performed

elsewhere in the body as a standard of practice - both with and without

stents - for more than a decade. Vascular specialists who understand

vein abnormalities and blood flow must be allowed to do research beyond

what neurologists believe that CCSVI is not a causal MS factor. But,

what if, the possibility exists? Preserve us from this maddening

hypocrisy that the keepers of the Fortress supplicate their serious

concern for patients' risk-free safety with their own focused clinical

trials and approved drugs. At this time, self assessment and personal

anecdotes are the only validation factors we have until the Fortress

opens its heavy doors and allows proactive CCSVI researchers and doctors

to do their work.

Reason Three: This struggle will continue in the name of ethics and the Hippocratic Oath...physician, do no harm. It has been postulated for decades and overwhelming current evidence shows that it is more reasonable to assume that CCSVI precedes

autoimmunity. Therefore, a person who is newly diagnosed with MS,

cannot be denied access to diagnostic tools by professionals and

immediately get all the necessary veins fixed and tracked as a social

and moral right. Biological mechanisms such as narrowed veins or

arteries need to be treated with mechanical interventions before any

arsenal of life-long drugs only to be used as a secondary precedence.

http://www.healthcentral.com/multiple-sclerosis/c/49747/123671/rebels/6