Naar homepage     
Chronische Cerebro-Spinale Veneuze Insufficiëntie
Aanmelden op het CCSVI.nl forum
Lees Voor (ReadSpeaker)    A-   A+
Over CCSVI.nl | Zoeken | Contact | Forum
CCSVI.nl is onderdeel van de
Franz Schelling Website
meer informatie
  
Wednesday, January 5, 2011 6:17 AM | Ken Torbert Volg link

Mainstream medical opinion is roundly skeptical of Paolo Zamboni’s “liberation” treatment for multiple sclerosis, but that’s not to say the Italian surgeon won’t one day be vindicated. As many have pointed out, nobody believed the Heliobacter pylori bacteria caused stomach ulcers either — but it does. It’s possible cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) — the name Dr. Zamboni gave to ostensibly constricted neck veins, which he relieves with angioplasty, often to rave reviews — will eventually be acknowledged as a key piece of the MS puzzle.


If so, Canadian politicians will be able to take some credit. Alberta, Newfoundland and the federal government have all agreed to spend money studying the treatment, and Saskatchewan plans full clinical trials. If they were honest, though, some of those politicians would admit they weren’t entirely motivated by an unquenchable thirst for medical truth.


Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff, who promises to fund clinical trials as prime minister, would be one. “Why can’t Canadians get a shot at getting at something that might have a therapeutic benefit?” the erstwhile professor asked last month, seemingly opening the door to everything from leech therapy to trepanation. Based on their op-ed in Tuesday’s Ottawa Citizen, Liberal health critic Ujjal Dosanjh and MP Kirsty Duncan would be two more. I claim no significant expertise on MS or CCSVI, but I know bad arguments when I see them.


Here’s one: Mr. Dosanjh and Ms. Duncan claim that the “scientific expert working group” on CCSVI, assembled by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, includes “no experts, no experience, and many undeclared conflicts of interest.”


Pardon? That’s 23 individuals they’re impugning there. They include respected neurologists from the Ottawa Hospital, the Cleveland Clinic, St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto, NYU and the Universities of Calgary, Wisconsin, Saskatchewan, British Columbia and Texas. So, what are these conflicts of interest? CCSVI activists such as Ashton Embry, a Calgary geologist, insinuate some working group members are in the pocket of pharmaceutical companies, which profit from current approaches to MS treatment. But that would be pretty strong stuff for politicians to hurl at respected physicians — so they don’t. They just drop the stink bomb and flee the scene.



Read more: http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/01/04/chris-selley-beware-of-politicians-playing-doctor/#ixzz1A8QghovI