To any of those who are against accepting the existance of, or the treatment to correct CCSVI. You have a list of various reasons to support your stand against CCSVI treatment. Can you expain why it is BETTER for a patient to not have their CCSVI untreated? How do patients, with or without MS, benefit from not treating their CCSVI? (As a note; It has proven reasonable to question and/or doubt responses from your side of this issue.)  

Why it is safer for a patient to not treat their CCSVI today? Why is it better to wait years for more research data, or wait years for small animal and human clinical trials before conducting better designed and larger human clinical trials with years before results are established?

On paper, the benefits of that tactic can be impressive, numbers and percentages to support the scientific methods worthy of being published with honor. There is respect and value of this science. But at what cost?

Consider the hundreds of thousands of people suffering from MS today. Some who can no longer contibute, and must now rely on society to maintain their lives.  Some suffering with MS can only hope, with total assistance, for one day at a time. What of the MS patients who just exist, because they have no options?

And what of those people to be diagnosed with MS tomorrow, or next week, next month, even two years from now? Or the tens of thousands of new cases of MS in a few years?

Is it better to live with MS and CCSVI? Is that the better defined and safer option? Better than to treat CCSVI now, though the best methods and the perfect treatment is not yet known?