Naar homepage     
Chronische Cerebro-Spinale Veneuze Insufficiëntie
Aanmelden op het CCSVI.nl forum
Lees Voor (ReadSpeaker)    A-   A+
Over CCSVI.nl | Zoeken | Contact | Forum
CCSVI.nl is onderdeel van de
Franz Schelling Website
meer informatie
  
Tuesday, November 1, 2011 6:09 PM | Ken Torbert Volg link

Source


From the Department of Neurology (F.D., S.J.S.), Clinical and Experimental Multiple Sclerosis Research Center (C.F.P., F.P.), and NeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Experimental and Clinical Research Center (J.T.W.), Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin; Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine (J.T.W.), Berlin; Neurological Centre (J.M.V.), Segeberger Kliniken, Bad Segeberg; and Institute of Neuroradiology (D.P.), University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.



Abstract


BACKGROUND:


Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) was proposed as the causal trigger for developing multiple sclerosis (MS). However, current data are contradictory and a gold standard for venous flow assessment is missing.


OBJECTIVE:


To compare structural magnetic resonance venography (MRV) and dynamic extracranial color-coded duplex sonography (ECCS) in a cohort of patients with MS.


METHODS:


We enrolled 40 patients (44 ± 10 years). All underwent contrast-enhanced MRV for assessment of internal jugular vein (IJV) and azygos vein (AV) narrowing, graded into 3 groups: 0%-50%, 51%-80%, and >80%. ECCS analysis of blood flow direction, cross-sectional area (CSA), and blood volume flow (BVF) in both IJV and vertebral veins (VV) occurred in the supine and upright body position.


RESULTS:


MRV identified 1 AV narrowing. IJV analysis yielded 12 patients for group 1 (30%), 19 patients for group 2 (48%), and 9 patients for group 3 (22%). By ECCS criteria, 4 patients (10%) presented with venous drainage abnormalities. Jugular BVF was different only between groups 1 and 3 (616 ± 133 vs 381 ± 213 mL/min, p = 0.02). No other parameters in supine position and none of the parameters in the upright body position, apart from the IJV-BVF decrease in groups 1 and 3 (479 ± 172 vs 231 ± 144 mL/min, p = 0.01), were different.


CONCLUSIONS:


Our ECCS data contradict the postulated 100% prevalence of CCSVI criteria in MS. MRV seems more sensitive to detect IJV narrowing compared to ECCS. A measurable hemodynamic effect only exists in vessel narrowings >80%. Our combined data argue against a causal relationship of venous narrowing and MS, favoring the rejection of the CCSVI hypothesis.




PMID:

22031530

[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]



http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22031530